Epic Seven

OFFICIAL

General Discussion

Kia Soul Cheater despite Content Creator, Abusing No Fort Strat in Guild Wars [39]

  • STOVE135365282
  • 2020.02.07 12:14 (UTC+0)
  • 조회수 1307

Kia Soul and his Guild in Global 20 IQ has been abusing this for months now


https://www.reddit.com/r/EpicSeven/comments/edbktv/20iq_uses_fleet_strategy_and_gw_matchmaking_rant/ 


https://www.reddit.com/r/EpicSeven/comments/ef287w/why_is_nothing_still_being_done_to_20iq_guild/


Many Evidence dated back 


This guild is cheating and the top leaders (Kia Soul needs to be banned)


not only is he a Content Creator, bu the uses Exploits and Glitches like this, it is an Exploit


By Abusing No Fort Strat, you can win every Guild Wars very easily with Havoc, since your enemy will have less Havoc when they go for full clear. So if you full clear them you will win in the Guild Wars


It is a Cheat and i can't believe SG / Smile Gate allows this

포스트 39

  • images
    2020.02.08 01:15 (UTC+0)

    BESTHow funny that people actually think leaving the Fort empty is actual strat and not a bug.


    100% certain the one who said so is not Vice Captain or Guild Leader.


    First thing first, 

    You Cannot leave the fort empty under normal circumstance. It wouldn't let you save the assigned position if the fort empty. 

    This mean it was built so all Fort must be filled because if it's empty, they shouldn't be able to assigned anyone on the castle !!


    Then how do they leave the fort empty?

    Easy, there is 2 way to do that.

    Either the member assigned on the fort leave the guild OR the Captain/Vice Captain kicked them.


    This mean those who use empty fort in GW actually intentionally abusing the bug. Maybe for those who use it a few time, they just not aware of it but it shouldn't applied to those who use it for many months.


    If you guys think this is an official strat from SG, why don't you try to leave a video that you can actually leave the fort empty while assigning everyone on the castle.

  • images
    작성자 2020.02.07 16:20 (UTC+0)

    BESTit is clearly abuse because he intentionally not put members into Forts, as a result making the Forts Empty. This is 100% intentional, even if they lack members why would you think they didn't put ppl on forts?


    Huche Shop is relevant because its the same thing and its an exploit


    This Bug Abuse allows Kia Soul and his cheating clan to gain something, that is to win in Every Guild Wars


    You have to be really stupid to not understand that, if both clans fought each and managed to full Clear Everything


    The other Clan will LOSE and Kia Soul 20 IQ clan will WIN. Because of THIS EXPLOIT


    Do u seriously think winning every Guild Wars and making the other guild Lose is not an ADVANTAGE? Using this Exploit and Bug gives u MASSIVE ADVANTAGE IN HAVOC

  • images
    2020.02.07 12:26 (UTC+0)

    This is at most a system flaw, definitely not something banable because it doesn't directly hurt sgs revenue. Any guild can simply choose not to put anyone on the fort and can justify by claiming not enough members. I don't see why you think it is fair to only frame a particular person cheater even though it doesn't involve any third party tool. If anything all guilds that didn't place a person on fort should be banned with your logic. 

  • images
    작성자 2020.02.07 13:06 (UTC+0)

    Its not a system flaw because 20 iq and KIA SOUL INTENTIONALLY knows this bug and ABUSES IT


    They abuses this to win guild wars while making sure that the other guild cannot win


    Did u forgot they ban ppl awhile ago on Huche Shop the same thing? Even ppl got perma banned?


    Its because they know its an Exploit and they uses it.


    These people are AWARE its a bug and ABUSES IT


    Stop defending Cheaters


    The fact that Kia Soul is a content creator and yet abuses it, is absolutely disgusting

  • ic-caution

    작성자에 의해 삭제된 댓글입니다.

  • images
    작성자 2020.02.07 16:20 (UTC+0)

    it is clearly abuse because he intentionally not put members into Forts, as a result making the Forts Empty. This is 100% intentional, even if they lack members why would you think they didn't put ppl on forts?


    Huche Shop is relevant because its the same thing and its an exploit


    This Bug Abuse allows Kia Soul and his cheating clan to gain something, that is to win in Every Guild Wars


    You have to be really stupid to not understand that, if both clans fought each and managed to full Clear Everything


    The other Clan will LOSE and Kia Soul 20 IQ clan will WIN. Because of THIS EXPLOIT


    Do u seriously think winning every Guild Wars and making the other guild Lose is not an ADVANTAGE? Using this Exploit and Bug gives u MASSIVE ADVANTAGE IN HAVOC

  • images
    작성자 2020.02.07 16:22 (UTC+0)

     

    and of course I would be angry because we face cheaters today


    ppl who abuse it a few times could be due to mistakes. but 20iq and Kia Soul uses this for a VERY LONG TIME. They KNOW ITS AN EXPLOIT AND ABUSES IT. Why would they keep using it huh? cuz it helps them to win with Exploits and Cheats

  • images
    작성자 2020.02.07 16:29 (UTC+0)

    SG also acknowledged and responds on here saying its a bug


    and ppl try to defend bugs and cheaters


    Kia Soul knows an its an EXPLOIT, Devs can check logs on Guild wars, they will see 20iq uses this every Guild Wars. This is affecting other Guilds and making them quits the game


    This Bug/ Explit AFFECTS OTHER TOP GUILDS


    All proof is on Guild Wars and everywhere


    https://page.onstove.com/epicseven/global/view/4673347

  • images
    2020.02.07 18:23 (UTC+0)

    Again with this. THIS IS NOT A BUG! Go back and read the Dev. Notes when guild war was released. "First guild to destroy other guilds stronghold wins." If your guild can't even get rid of the smaller castles to get to the main stronghold, then you weren't going to win. This strategy may deny guilds points, but it actually makes winning conditions easier depending on how well prepared your guild is. Also they fixed the guild war so that you could only participate if you had minimum player requirement and someone in the main stronghold. Points only matter if none of the guilds can get to the stronghold and defeat it. If your guild is weak and you use this strategy, you are going to lose faster. Go ahead, try it.

  • images
    2020.02.07 19:28 (UTC+0)

    If you think it is not a bug (which is decided by anyone but SG), read "Unfair Actions" in Article 7, Service Use Restriction of Operation Policy. According to that, action including Hindering Fair Play and Collusive Action Between Users falls into this group and the punishments are the same as bug abuse. Full description of this group is as follows:


    Group: Unfair Actions

    Subgroup: Hindering Fair Play and Collusive Action Between Users

    Description: Actions manipulating the outcomes of battles through deliberate abnormal play, and earning benefits from doing so E.g.) Collusive action between players and/or guild members with the intention of earning benefits through manipulating rankings or competitive content

    Punishment: 7 Days/ 30 Days/ Permanent Ban

    Reference: Article 7, Service Use Restriction of Operation Policy


    For those who still want to defend for SG no matter what, is this No fort strat considered as "deliberate abnormal play"? May be you don't think so but I think it is.

  • ic-caution

    작성자에 의해 삭제된 댓글입니다.

  • images
    2020.02.08 01:15 (UTC+0)

    How funny that people actually think leaving the Fort empty is actual strat and not a bug.


    100% certain the one who said so is not Vice Captain or Guild Leader.


    First thing first, 

    You Cannot leave the fort empty under normal circumstance. It wouldn't let you save the assigned position if the fort empty. 

    This mean it was built so all Fort must be filled because if it's empty, they shouldn't be able to assigned anyone on the castle !!


    Then how do they leave the fort empty?

    Easy, there is 2 way to do that.

    Either the member assigned on the fort leave the guild OR the Captain/Vice Captain kicked them.


    This mean those who use empty fort in GW actually intentionally abusing the bug. Maybe for those who use it a few time, they just not aware of it but it shouldn't applied to those who use it for many months.


    If you guys think this is an official strat from SG, why don't you try to leave a video that you can actually leave the fort empty while assigning everyone on the castle.

  • images
    2020.02.08 08:57 (UTC+0)

    Please SG do something, this its really important to fix.

General Discussion의 글

STOVE 추천 컨텐츠